From f3da6b41f1deb29666950fdb9f85821e1072d0a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Addie Morrison <developer@0xADD1E.me>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2019 16:41:11 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Take mharju's suggestion to explicitly use int64_t

---
 src/parquet_cursor.cc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/parquet_cursor.cc b/src/parquet_cursor.cc
index efeeafe..14cc817 100644
--- a/src/parquet_cursor.cc
+++ b/src/parquet_cursor.cc
@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ void ParquetCursor::ensureColumn(int col) {
       }
       case parquet::Type::INT64: {
         parquet::Int64Scanner *s = (parquet::Int64Scanner *)scanners[col].get();
-        long long rv = 0;
+        int64_t rv = 0;
         s->NextValue(&rv, &wasNull);
         break;
       }
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ void ParquetCursor::ensureColumn(int col) {
     }
     case parquet::Type::INT64: {
       parquet::Int64Scanner *s = (parquet::Int64Scanner *)scanners[col].get();
-      long long rv = 0;
+      int64_t rv = 0;
       hadValue = s->NextValue(&rv, &wasNull);
       colIntValues[col] = rv;
       break;